Monday, June 4, 2012

WAR ON WOMEN IS OBAMA'S LIE - GOP EMBRACES WOMEN AS DEMOCRATS TAKE THEM FOR GRANTED!

DEMOCRATS CONTINUE THEIR SHAM SIDESHOW

S. 3220, the Paycheck Fairness Act (PFA) purports to solve the problem of women earning 77 cents to the dollar that men earn. However, recent studies show that is not the case, in fact, young women in their 20's who have no children and are unmarried actually make 17 cents more per dollar that comparable young men earn.

PFA allows employees to easily sue their employers based on absurd claims of gender discrimination as the reason for their unequal pay. Does this mean young men will be able to sue for earning less?
CLICK HERE to Fax the Senate and tell them NOT to waste their time on the Paycheck Fairness Act (S.3220). The Paycheck Fairness Act allows employees to claim gender discrimination is the reason for their unequal pay and force employers to prove otherwise. It also removes the limits on punitive and compensatory damages, meaning trial lawyers could sue for inordinate amounts, bankrupting companies for false accusations and reaping in the profits.


Help Conservative Action Alerts inform the American people, and the Senate, about the damage this legislation will do not only to businesses who find themselves being sued thanks to this bill, but also to the women who would simply not be hired in order to avoid such lawsuits.

Senate Democrats are touting this bill and continuing to claim that Republicans are waging a "war on women" for not supporting this deeply flawed legislation.

First off, President Obama and Democrats are constantly reminding us that the first bill they passed after President Obama was inaugurated was the Lilly Ledbetter Act, which was supposed to make unequal pay a thing of the past. They couldn't have solved the problem and still make the claim that women earn less. It's one or the other; either the Lilly Ledbetter Act was a gimmick, or this one is.

Actually, it's both.

PFA makes it very easy for employees to claim gender discrimination, and puts the burden on the employer to prove that the claim is false. That is not how the American justice system is supposed to work. It is the burden of the accuser to prove the accused is guilty. One cannot simply make a claim without real evidence and then sit back and watch as the accused tries to disprove the claim.

But that is exactly what the PFA does.

The bill doesn't even exempt women business owners (which are the fastest growing segment of business starters). Are they just as culpable for discriminating against women when it comes to pay?

This bill is not being marketed to men as a way to equalize their pay. Will they even know that they can exploit it? Does it matter?
CLICK HERE to Fax the Senate and tell them NOT to waste their time on the Paycheck Fairness Act (S.3220). The Paycheck Fairness Act allows employees to claim gender discrimination is the reason for their unequal pay and force employers to prove otherwise. It also removes the limits on punitive and compensatory damages, meaning trial lawyers could sue for inordinate amounts, bankrupting companies for false accusations and reaping in the profits.

Help Conservative Action Alerts inform the American people, and the Senate, about the damage this legislation will do not only to businesses who find themselves being sued thanks to this bill, but also to the women who would simply not be hired in order to avoid such lawsuits.


The Paycheck Fairness Act would:
  • Facilitate lawsuits and gives a windfall to trial lawyers, making it lucrative for them to sue for massive amounts of punitive damages, which in turn would costs jobs and could bankrupt companies.
  • Specify that workers are automatically part of a class action lawsuit, unless they opt out. This would encourage trial lawyers to enact multiple frivolous class-action suits in the hopes of winning some large settlements. Fearing this, businesses may decide not to hire more people for fear of reprisal.
  • Make millions for trial lawyers while costing jobs for those already struggling.
  • Allow the courts to micromanage businesses by forcing employers to prove that unequal pay is a result of a "bona fide factor other than sex." The employee simply has to come up with an alternative employment practice that would eliminate the pay disparity. For instance, if the employer said she was not as educated as her male counterpart, she could claim that her employer should send her to training and then pay her the same wage. Education would no longer be a "bona fide" factor because she found an alternative employment practice.


CLICK HERE to Fax the Senate and tell them NOT to waste their time on the Paycheck Fairness Act (S.3220). The Paycheck Fairness Act allows employees to claim gender discrimination is the reason for their unequal pay and force employers to prove otherwise. It also removes the limits on punitive and compensatory damages, meaning trial lawyers could sue for inordinate amounts, bankrupting companies for false accusations and reaping in the profits.

Help Conservative Action Alerts inform the American people, and the Senate, about the damage this legislation will do not only to businesses who find themselves being sued thanks to this bill, but also to the women who would simply not be hired in order to avoid such lawsuits.


But aside from the consequences this law would have on businesses and hiring, the fact of the matter remains that women don't earn less than men when other factors are taken into consideration.

For instance, men are more likely to become engineers or work in dangerous jobs like on oil rigs. Men also tend to work more hours a week, whereas many women work fewer hours in order to care for their children. Obviously some men work less to care for their children and some women don't have kids, but there are enough on each side to make a straight up apples-to-apples comparison flawed.

When all factors are considered, women might earn a few cents less than men, but remember that childless, unmarried women in their 20s earn, on average, 17 cents more per dollar than comparable young men. And since more women are going to college now than men, this statistic will soon be greater.

So the unequal pay that this legislation is supposed to be correcting doesn't even exist!

CLICK HERE to Fax the Senate and tell them NOT to waste their time on the Paycheck Fairness Act (S.3220). The Paycheck Fairness Act allows employees to claim gender discrimination is the reason for their unequal pay and force employers to prove otherwise. It also removes the limits on punitive and compensatory damages, meaning trial lawyers could sue for inordinate amounts, bankrupting companies for false accusations and reaping in the profits.

Help Conservative Action Alerts inform the American people, and the Senate, about the damage this legislation will do not only to businesses who find themselves being sued thanks to this bill, but also to the women who would simply not be hired in order to avoid such lawsuits.


Senate Democrats are trying to make an issue where this is none. Well, there are parts of the country where women do earn less than men for equal work, one of which is...Senate Democrat offices!

A recent report found that 37 out of the 50 members of the Democrat caucus paid their female staffers less than their male staffers. In fact, 3 of the 5 Democrat Senators that touted the Paycheck Fairness Act - Patty Murray (D-WA), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) - in fact pay their own female staffers less.

Senator Murray pays her female staffers on average 35.2% less than male staffers. Senator Boxer pays her female staffers 7.3% less and Senator Feinstein pays her female staffers a whopping 41% less than her male staffers. Talk about gender inequality!

And Senate Democrats aren't the only hypocrites, President Obama's female staffers earn about 13% less than his male staffers.

Yet they're trying to bring their brand of equality into the private sector?

CLICK HERE to Fax the Senate and tell them NOT to waste their time on the Paycheck Fairness Act (S.3220). The Paycheck Fairness Act allows employees to claim gender discrimination is the reason for their unequal pay and force employers to prove otherwise. It also removes the limits on punitive and compensatory damages, meaning trial lawyers could sue for inordinate amounts, bankrupting companies for false accusations and reaping in the profits.

Help Conservative Action Alerts inform the American people, and the Senate, about the damage this legislation will do not only to businesses who find themselves being sued thanks to this bill, but also to the women who would simply not be hired in order to avoid such lawsuits.


Liberal hypocrites who want to claim there is pay inequality are trying to pass legislation that would keep businesses from hiring the very people the bill is purported to help. Please Fax every Senator now and tell them that S.3220 is dangerous for the business community and for the unemployed.


I will not be defrauded anymore by the IRS and Illegal Immigrants,

Conservative Action Alerts
http://news.dienerconsultants.com/ct/8805261:12196349963:m:1:196255036:19E06DB9CBF9DC8F011A1DF85E259853:r

P. S. Before Democrats try to tell the rest of the country how to act, they should first make sure their hands are clean. Touting legislation that is supposed to end pay inequality while paying women less than men does not help one's cause.

You can also CLICK HERE to send a FREE message directly to YOUR U.S. Representative and Senators!



This bill allows trial lawyers to make big bucks suing for copious amounts of punitive damages due to so-called gender discrimination. And since litigation such as this is basically a lottery - that is, a host of circumstances must align for a winning case (such as the right judge, right victim, etc.) - Senate Democrats are essentially trying to pass a bill that will harm business just to maybe help some victims who may or may not have actually been discriminated against.

If you're sick of trial lawyers wining big while the rest of us suffer, you'll urge your Senator NOT to support the Paycheck Fairness Act.

No comments:

Post a Comment